The Pros And Cons Of Firefox
Posted by Donster on: 2005-04-20 16:53:18 1873
By Fred Langa @ InformationWeek

Firefox is a good browser but not the panacea its most ardent fans think it is. While Microsoft's IE gets most of the attention for its security vulnerabilities, the reality is that Firefox (like other open-source products) has security flaws of its own of that readers need to be aware of, Fred Langa notes.

Read on...

News Source: Email

TheDude
 Posted on: 2005-04-20 18:33:23
Man, Microsoft must be paying these guys to write this stuff. Despite its vulnerabilities, FireFox is a grillion times better than the IE browser, and, when it comes to patching or adding mods, it's a one-click exercise.

Doesn't matter how big the user base is, or the vulnerability rate, or whatever mumbo jumbo the IE spin doctors palaver on about, Firefox is just better and has oh so many cool and useful mods.

Comment #1


TheDude
 Posted on: 2005-04-21 12:10:33
Here's some more Firefox goodness: Spread Firefox.

This fine rebuttal was on that page:

Over the last few days I've seen several stories around the release of the Firefox 1.0.3 update with ridiculous headlines like "Firefox Comes Under Attack", "Firefox Singed By Security Holes", and "Security Holes Bite Firefox".

I understand that sensational sells, and I'm sorry to be the bearer of bad news for all of the lazy journalists out there, but Firefox wasn't hit, or attacked, or bitten, or singed, by anything.

The lazyman's story seems to be that as Firefox's popularity grows, so will the attacks, bites, singes, hits, etc. This is not at all what we're seeing here. What we're seeing here is that as Firefox's popularity grows, so does the Firefox community. That community has grown to include tens of millions of new users, almost 100,000 Firefox evangelists, tens of thousands of new bug reporters and testers, and quite a few new and very capable security investigators. We're pleased to have more people developing, testing, and thinking about Firefox -- and most importantly, working directly with the Firefox team to help us improve our world-class browser.

See, that's a major difference between our open process and the closed processes of our competitors. When security experts, many of whom are are in it for the thrill of solving these kinds of complex problems, are ignored or slighted, or attacked by a vendor, they are left with little recourse except to post the exploits publicly in the hope that doing so will shine a bright spotlight on the problem and force the hand of the vendor. With Firefox, those same security researchers and experts can engage directly with our development team, participating in the tasks of investigating, solving, and testing the problems and be rewarded for it with public recognition (and in cases of the most serious issues, financial recognition).

Our open development process welcomes the growing community of experts who are willing to contribute their skills to our project. The more popular the Firefox project gets, the more likely we are to continue attracting these high-value contributors and the result will be a better Firefox web browser and a faster, safer, and more secure internet experience for our users.

So, what should these headlines have read? Well, how about "Firefox Project Attracts More Security Experts" or "Firefox Security Community Grows" :-)

Cross-posted from adot's notblog*, my primary weblog.



Comment #2



Post New Comment
Note: Comments have been disabled.
Icon:
                 
                 
Message:
Include my profile signature.
Disable smilies in this post.
Disable block tag code.
Add [url] tag at URLs.


© 2024 COMBATSIM.COM - All Rights Reserved