Book Review: The Secret Wars of America's Commandos in Vietnam - Page 1/1
Created on 2005-02-08
Title: Book Review: The Secret Wars of America's Commandos in Vietnam By: David Pascoe Date: 1999-07-12 1694 Flashback:Orig. Multipage Version Hard Copy:Printer Friendly
Author: John L. Plaster
The title sounds like one of those titillating exposes on horrible
things done by the US military during the Vietnam war by Peter Arnett,
CNN and the usual stuff by that gang of anti military, establishment
journalists. But it's not.
There are no stories here about commandos using nerve gas on the
Vietnamese people as they lug bags of rice down the Ho Chi Minh trail
on their backs. No stories about ruthless US Commanders sending out
assassination squads to murder deserting or captured American soldiers
in Cambodia. Nothing about evil commandos determined to "kill 'em all
and let God sort 'em out." If one is looking for tender morsels to
justify a viewpoint of the evil of US involvement in Vietnam, you won't
find it here.
One of the few commando books to be first published in hardcover, SOG
is an exceptionally well researched account of the Special Operations
Group mission in Indochina, covert and otherwise. I rate it as one of
the best books on the subject, as told from the summary viewpoint of
the men in the field, their field officers and commanders. It is this
three-way perspective that gives the book a certain uniqueness.
Many readers will recognize that US involvement in Vietnam began as
early as the late 1950's (the official records of which remain
classified) under the auspices of the CIA and William Colby, one of the
top OSS operatives during WW II, and who later was to become the
Director of Central Intelligence. If ever there were a man who knew how
to run a covert war, it was Bill Colby, and while this book has nothing
to do with the former DCI, it has everything to do with his philosophy
on counterinsurgency.
SOG, originally named the Special Operations Group, was formed up
exclusively of volunteers from SEALS, Green Berets, Rangers and Air
Force Commandos, for political reasons SOG was given the hilarious
official name of Studies and Observations Group. While observation was
indeed a large part of it's role, the "study" was largely confined to
methods to methods by which to harass and terrorize the enemy through
covert operations.
SOG was the brainchild of no one, but the outgrowth of three
presidential administrations and the CIA's desire for intelligence and
the covert effort to counteract Communist insurgency into South Vietnam
from obstenisbly neutral Laos and Cambodia. This, in the interest of
"containing" the war within Vietnam's boundaries that it might not
escallate into a widespread Indochina war.
A little known fact is that the Ho Chi Minh trail in Laos had its
beginning all the way back in 1953 when the Viet Minh reestablished an
old network of roadways to initiate attacks on the south. For political
reasons, the Johnson Administration publicly ignored and downplayed
this. Thus, the war had spread into these countries at least a decade
before US troop deployment.
From Robert McNamara's infamous OPLAN 34A in December 1963, SOG
recounts some of the more spectacular exploits of these behind the
scenes commandos, up through the ill-fated ARVN operation Lam Son 729
in 1972, that last year of American troops in Vietnam. Included are the
exploits of the legendary commando Jerry "Mad Dog" Shriver, so
nicknamed not by his peers, but by Hanoi Radio who put a very high
bounty on his head. Shriver served three years with SOG, the longest
stint by any recon man during the war.
Typically Shriver:
It was Mad Dog Shriver who'd spoken the most famous rejoinder in SOG
history: His team surrounded and Command concerned that [his team]
might be overrun, a Forward Air Controller told Shriver, "It sounds
pretty bad down there." And Shriver replied, "No, no, I've got them
right where I want them -- surrounded from the inside."
SOG units had both major similarities and differences from the recon
units that were later formed, units such as the Army LRRP's, Marine
Force Recon units and many others. First and foremost was the fact that
Special Operations Groups were not under the command of MACV and
General Westmoreland, but rather the Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs
themselves for covert security reasons.
For political reasons that today seem nothing if not bizarre, SOG
groups were considered to be "illegal" and therefore conducted with the
greatest of secrecy. This made them different to the extent that the
restraints placed on the "official," MACV-designated (Military
Assistance Command - Vietnam) recon teams did not exist for SOG. They
were "go-anywhere, do anything" commandos with the dual role of recon
and taking the battle to the enemy.
In the later regard, they performed much like the early SEAL missions
-- before their free reign was curtailed -- where a major element of
their role was sowing fear amongst the enemy operating over the
borders. Unlike the large numbers of recon units that would follow, the
SOG mission was offensive, facilitated in no small part by those
inherently devious former OSS men who were to direct it's operations.
While the arguments continue to rage about which of the numerous recon
units throughout the war conducted the greater exploits, none of the
others were ever sanctioned to operate over Vietnam's borders, and none
were officially (albeit covertly) sanctioned for offensive operations.
SOG was, and this is what makes for some truly spectacular operations
and one hell of a good read.
As Plaster points out, a mere 50 SOG Americans caused the NVA to devote
three full divisions to guard the Ho Chi Minh trail, an economy of
force ratio of 600:1, or one full battalion per SOG man. It was not a
matter of how many enemy they could kill, but how many NVA could be
tied up and taken out of offensive operations that mattered.
This is the essence of the SOG strategy, letting the enemy know that
just because he was operating in Cambodia did not mean that he was
going to be safe. The tiny six-man SOG teams would take every
opportunity to attack and harass the enemy. From blowing up ammo dumps,
laying booby traps and ambushes, to snatching messengers and officers
off the trial, they did it all.
Unlike many other recon books, SOG features fairly extensive background
on the whys and wherefores of its operations. The lack of same is not a
fault of similar books, but rather stems from the fact that other recon
units were often kept out of the intel loop and in the dark by officers
who used LRRP's in just about any way they saw fit.
Not subject to MACV command, SOG units were an integral part of the
intel effort (what with the CIA being one of its parents), and as such
were often given extensive background and intel briefings by their
independent commanders. This increased SOG's performance immeasurably,
and the lack of which was later to prove one of the primary causes of
high mortality rates of other recon teams that were often sent out with
no intel whatsoever.
SOG turns out to be quite a bit more scholarly than its catchy title
might suggest. Despite being highly detailed, it remains eminently
readable and decidedly engaging. There's enough adrenaline flowing here
to keep any excitement junky turning the pages through the wee hours of
the night. Most importantly, at least in my view, SOG does an excellent
job in setting the stage for all the special force unit operations that
follow. If you're interested in pursuing the many books on special
forces operations, I'd recommend reading this one first.
The Secret Wars...
Onyx paperback, 1998
370 pages
Other Great Recon Books:
"Never Without Heros," Lawrence C. Vetter, Ivy Books, 1996, Paperback.
Marine Third Recon Battalion in Vietnam, 1965-70. Another exceptionally
well researched and written book based on hundreds of interviews by a
veteran of that battalion. Small print in 338 pages covers dozens of
ops mainly in Military Region One. I rate this book as one of the best
on the subject of recon patrol action, tactics, battles and the
conflicts between the reconners and their commanders. It sheds a lot of
light on the concrete bound mentality of Marine leadership, without
engaging in direct criticism.
While the Army pioneered air mobile Calvary with the Huey UH-1
helicopter, we discover here how the Marine attitude toward air
mobility, its failure to keep pace with evolving tactics and equipment,
and how its reliance on aging and unsuitable aircraft (Sea King, CH 46
& CH 53 helicopters) doomed hundreds, if not thousands of Marines
to their deaths. We also discover why the Army had long ago stopped
"prepping' their LZ's because it was like holding up a neon sign over
the LZ saying, "here we are!" Yet the Marine command continued to
maintain this preparation as standard doctrine.
"Six Silent Men," A three book trilogy on the 101 LRP/Rangers by Gary
A. Linderer, Reynel Martinez, and Kenn Miller. Ivy Books, 1997,
paperback. Each of the three books has a separate author although the
material was researched and assembled by all three. Originally
intending to write just one book, it became too long and was broken up
into three books. The Army recon experience contrasted with that of SOG
and the Marines, based strictly on personal accounts.
These are war stories at their finest, replete with all the trials and
tribulations encountered from the enemy without, and the enemy within.
While not particularly critical of US command, the authors are not shy
in criticizing how both Washington and in-country Commanders pervert
the recon function to roles the LRP's were not trained or intended to
accomplish, such as combat support.
You'll also get a good look at the tremendous bond formed between the
LRPs and their chopper pilots, and why so many of these officer pilots
risked their lives time and again, displaying incredible feats of
heroism. Good supporting background info and a generally easy and
entertaining read.
"Good to Go," Harry Constance and Randall Fuerst, Avon Books, 1997,
paperback, 412 pages. The personal experiences of a Navy SEAL in
Vietnam. Dates are often one of the Achilles heels of military
non-fiction. The authors know the time frames, but often forget that
the reader wasn't there by his side. So it is with this book, which is
one of its few flaws. Who Randal Fuerst, the co-author is, the book
doesn't say, but presumably it is his ghost writer who does a pretty
good job of putting the material in order.
The first hand accounts of missions and battles are most engaging, but
I did feel that there is a bit too much of the author's personal
history, particularly his trials and tribulations with his first wife.
Even so, the book is well worth reading in order to gain a perspective
on the SEAL method of recon, intel gathering, and taking it to the
enemy. You can just skip over the man's personal problems.
Aside from the great descriptions of the action -- and some
hair-raising stuff at that -- the SEAL method of operation was much
different, and in my view, considerably more effective than the methods
employed by other recon units. That's mainly because like the SOG's,
the SEALs were briefly given free reign in their ops and methods.
It is also because these SEALs were trained in and took regional
pacification doctrine seriously, quite unlike the Marines who made the
big mistake of ignoring the role of the civilian. By the simple acts of
befriending the locals and treating them with respect, these reconners
were able to develop incredible flows of information.
Conversely, the Marine commanders viewed pacification as
sissy stuff. Woe to the Marines that ignoring the sissy stuff meant
that indifferent villagers became enemy villagers, that friendly
villages became enemy strongholds that were ultimately the undoing of
Marine General Lewis Walt, who fought McNamara's and Westmoreland's
pacification programs every inch of the way.
In less than 18 months, the free reign of the SEALs was curtailed and
the productivity of SEALs ops dropped off dramatically until their
recon role was scrubbed altogether. Above all things, this book really
sheds light on the potential of pacification, the failure of which is
often blamed for the loss of the war.
"First Force Recon Company, Sunrise at Midnight," Dr. Bill Peters, Ivy
Books, 1999, paperback, 238 pages. Another personal Marine account of
the Recon experience primarily in the the DaNang area valleys such as
Elepant and Happy valleys and Que Son Mountains. Concentrates solely on
the recon experience and is a good and exciting read.